Family Reunifications and Economic Prudence: Parent, Grandparent Immigration

which is hedged on emotional ramifications and economic considerations for a country that is battling its own economic woes in days of global slowdown.

A freeze on immigration of parents and grandparents had been implemented in the year 2011. This had created a backlog wait period of approximately eight years. Simply stating, the government had stepped in with the measure to contain the tax burden on the earning citizens of the country. It is will be pertinent to note here that citizens being considered here are not only those who are natural born but also those who have acquired it. So to say, the government insisted that the economic woes should not be doubled up with additional tax burdens and, therefore, a moratorium placed in the interest of the citizens.
The squabble against such an ‘imposition’ rallied against popular sentiments of the right to reunite with families. The wrangle when logically viewed extends beyond the understanding at first sight. The government never denied the right to reunifications. The curb was for a reasonable cause. It actually hurt the government and is supported by the fact that this measure to lift the moratorium is a populist measure. So, why would the government put a populist measure into hibernation for two years unless there is a raison d'être?

Yes, there are additional stringent norms that have to be complied with the next 5000 completed applications. Under the new parent and grandparent program in 2014 the minimum income of the sponsoring family has been increased to $45,039, a 30% increase to the previous earning requirement and should have been so in the last three years. The period of sponsorship has also been increased to 20 years against the existing 10 years. What do these measures imply? They underscore the fact that the government is not against reunification but arguably reunifications that are economically sustainable for both the country and the families in future.

It can be noted that the government has not withdrawn or imposed any limitations on Super Visa which grants multiple entries for a period up to 10 years and allows the individual to stay for a period of two years on each entry. In addition, 10 year multiple entry visas, which are over and above the Super Visa, permit a stay of 6 months on each entry. So, an implied understanding that the government may not viewing reunification as a family essential is fundamentally skewed. 5000 applications can be viewed as less but not an indication of complete denial. Yes, there is a backlog woe but all for reasons of economic prudence in times of financial adversity.

Immigration Frauds

Thu, 09/11/2014 - 18:32

These days’ fraudulent agents are on a hunt for people desperately wanting to migrate to various countries. People get trapped in the scams played by such agents and end up losing their money and hope. Scammers these days use technology,...

Money Matters

Sun, 07/13/2014 - 17:20

It provides them with the opportunity to give to their community. Lawyers provide a valuable service, and one that not everyone can afford.

In the wake of an economic downturn many people in need of legal expertise are unable to access it due to a lack of finances. Through pro bono work, many individuals in need are able to get access to the justice that's entitled to everyone.

If you're looking for a pro bono lawyer in Canada, there are a few important...

CIC Announcements

Thu, 09/18/2014 - 11:06

With the launch of Express Entry in 2015 January, the country aims to reduce processing and wait time for skilled immigrants. This is also observed as an effort to control any kind of ill practice adopted by the employers. Precisely, the objective is to ensure that a job vacancy is offered to the Canadian employee first and only then it should be forwarded to any immigrant...